Too costly, too risky, most negative impact

Reference Number
539
Text

I strongly agree with Mark S. Winfield's submission - Reference Number 175.  I quote one passage in his submission: 

The proposed project would have major implications for the sustainability of the Ontario's electricity system and economy. The proposed project potentialy represents the highest-cost, -risk, and negative-impact option for meeting the province's future electricity needs.

There are just too many negative long-term implications with this proposal to warrant its existance.

Why go down the road of nuclear when there are lower cost, less risky, least negative-impact options?

 

Submitted by
Rosemary Tayler
Phase
Planning
Public Notice
Public Notice - Comments invited on the summary of the Initial Project Description and funding available
Attachment(s)
N/A
Date Submitted
2026-02-12 - 12:01 AM
Date modified: