New Nuclear at Wesleyville Project
Too costly, too risky, most negative impact
- Reference Number
- 539
- Text
I strongly agree with Mark S. Winfield's submission - Reference Number 175. I quote one passage in his submission:
The proposed project would have major implications for the sustainability of the Ontario's electricity system and economy. The proposed project potentialy represents the highest-cost, -risk, and negative-impact option for meeting the province's future electricity needs.
There are just too many negative long-term implications with this proposal to warrant its existance.
Why go down the road of nuclear when there are lower cost, less risky, least negative-impact options?
- Submitted by
- Rosemary Tayler
- Phase
- Planning
- Public Notice
- Public Notice - Comments invited on the summary of the Initial Project Description and funding available
- Attachment(s)
- N/A
- Date Submitted
- 2026-02-12 - 12:01 AM