Dubious claims of "surface connections to liquid magma" at the Revell Batholith and associated "giant orbs that oscillate generating energy fields"

Ignoring the “giant orbs that oscillate generating energy fields” for the moment, the geology of the Revell batholith has never had anything to do with any “surface connection to liquid magma”.

The Revell batholith is known to have formed about 2.7 BILLION years ago, by liquid magma intruding into Greenstone that was already in place since over another billion years earlier.

That intrusion of liquid magma never reached the surface:  It occurred several kilometers BELOW THE SURFACE of the existing Greenstone, which itself was at the base of a shallow sea.

If the intrusion of liquid magma had not stopped deep below surface, it simply would not have become granite.

Greenstone on the other hand, forms by direct contact of liquid magma with seawater, solidifying as the well-known “pillow lava”, eventually building up over millions of years to a thickness of several kilometers, thus providing the medium in which granite batholiths form many millions of years later.

Fast-forward a couple billion years, and the thick layer of Greenstone is eroded away, exposing the top surface of the long-buried granite batholith.

Of course any “connections to liquid magma” have long since solidified, and they never reached to the surface anyway, in the case of the batholith.

Perhaps Filteau is confusing Greenstone with the granite batholith, as the former did indeed have “connections to liquid magma” billions of years ago.