Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project

Comment Search Mobile

Comment Search

Skip to filters

1466 results

Attachment Preliminary Comments on ITISG for the Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project

  • Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Lac Seul First Nation
  • Reference Number: 1094
  • Submitted: 2026-05-25 - 4:49 PM
  • Updated: 2026-06-05 - 9:36 AM
  • Rationale: Comment updated for administrative purposes
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
  • Attachment Included
  • 1 May 25, 2026 Finn MacDonald Consultation Advisor, Impact Assessment Agency of Canada, Government of Canada finn.macdonald@iaac-aeic.gc.ca Re: Preliminary Comments on ITSIG for the Deep Geological Repository for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project Lac Seul First Nation writes to provide preliminary comments on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines (“ITISG”) for the Deep Geological Repository (“DGR”) for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project (the “Project”). This letter outlines our preliminary concerns with the impacts of transporting the nuclear waste, the Project’s specific impact on water systems, decision-making and climate change. More importantly, it highlights how these anticipated impacts are connected to Lac Seul’s Aboriginal and Treaty rights. Lac Seul’s comments are preliminary, as it has not yet received capacity funding to review the ITISG in-depth nor engage fully with traditional knowledge keepers. Lac ...

Report

Attachment Monetized Nuclear Waste Genocide Impact Statement #5 Summary

  • Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Marsha Ivall
  • Reference Number: 1075
  • Submitted: 2026-05-15 - 10:53 AM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Comments invited and information sessions on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and draft Public Participation Plan
  • See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • From: Marsha Ivall Sent Date: Fri May 15 10:53:42 2026 To: Nuclear Waste / Déchets Nucléaires (IAAC/AEIC) CC: Subject: Monetized Nuclear Waste Genocide Impact Statement #5 Summary Attachments: 1000000782.jpg(282KB); 1000000812.jpg(124KB); 1000000754.jpg(477KB); 1000000816.jpg(192KB) The Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) is nothing more than a lobby group for governmental and commercial nuclear waste producers. If you took a ride on their magic carpet (woven of lies.half truths.hidden agendas and bribing an bullying) you would believe you were travelling over a crystalline structure in an uninhabited land. Thats the first lie. The Arctic watershed they plan to use as a nuclear sewer is home to a million plus people. They have hidden that aspect of their so called plan. The second lie is that is safe. There is no history that confirms this. The third lie is that affected people agree. No one except those lavished with money consent. All native leaders have ...
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.

Report

Attachment Monetized Nuclear Waste Genocide Comment #3

  • Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Marsha Ivall
  • Reference Number: 1073
  • Submitted: 2026-05-15 - 9:00 AM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Comments invited and information sessions on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and draft Public Participation Plan
  • See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.
  • Attachment Included
  • From: Marsha Ivall Sent Date: Fri May 15 09:00:00 2026 To: Nuclear Waste / Déchets Nucléaires (IAAC/AEIC) CC: Subject: Monetized Nuclear Waste Genocide Attachments: 1000000815.jpg(102KB); 1000000741.jpg(201KB); 1000000801.jpg(113KB); 1000000782.jpg(282KB); 1000000807.jpg(142KB); 1000000800.jpg(204KB); 1000000818.jpg(80KB); 1000000816.jpg(192KB); 1000000806.jpg(124KB); 1000000754.jpg(477KB); 1000000819.jpg(133KB); 1000000812.jpg(124KB); 1000000804.jpg(148KB); 1000000808.jpg(111KB); 1000000780.jpg(284KB); 1000000743.jpg(279KB); 474c07ef- 93f0-4c12-a550-a3a7bc096174-1_all_7718.jpg(3460KB) IMPACT COMMENT PART 3 LEGAL ISSUES The genocidal secret plan is to use the Revell Lake to Lake of the Woods (and Winnipegs tap water) and through Manitoba to Hudsons Bay to the Arctic Ocean as a nuclear sewer to wash off equipment above ground. This plan has been hidden from a million plus people who have never been informed much less given consent. This above ground activity is GUARANTEED as part ...
  • Attachment Included
  • Please see the attachment to view the content.

Report

Attachment Monetized Nuclear Waste Genocide Part 4

  • Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Marsha Ivall
  • Reference Number: 1074
  • Submitted: 2026-05-15 - 12:14 AM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Comments invited and information sessions on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and draft Public Participation Plan
  • See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
  • Attachment Included
  • From: Marsha Ivall Sent Date: Fri May 15 09:00:00 2026 To: Nuclear Waste / Déchets Nucléaires (IAAC/AEIC) CC: Subject: Monetized Nuclear Waste Genocide Attachments: 1000000815.jpg(102KB); 1000000741.jpg(201KB); 1000000801.jpg(113KB); 1000000782.jpg(282KB); 1000000807.jpg(142KB); 1000000800.jpg(204KB); 1000000818.jpg(80KB); 1000000816.jpg(192KB); 1000000806.jpg(124KB); 1000000754.jpg(477KB); 1000000819.jpg(133KB); 1000000812.jpg(124KB); 1000000804.jpg(148KB); 1000000808.jpg(111KB); 1000000780.jpg(284KB); 1000000743.jpg(279KB); 474c07ef- 93f0-4c12-a550-a3a7bc096174-1_all_7718.jpg(3460KB) IMPACT COMMENT PART 3 LEGAL ISSUES The genocidal secret plan is to use the Revell Lake to Lake of the Woods (and Winnipegs tap water) and through Manitoba to Hudsons Bay to the Arctic Ocean as a nuclear sewer to wash off equipment above ground. This plan has been hidden from a million plus people who have never been informed much less given consent. This above ground activity is GUARANTEED as part ...

Report

Attachment Nishnawbe Aski Nation Comments on the draft TISG and draft IEPP for Proposed DGR Project [LAW-DOCS.FID73667]

  • Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Nishnawbe Aski Nation on May 11th
  • Reference Number: 1078
  • Submitted: 2026-05-14 - 3:31 PM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Comments invited and information sessions on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and draft Public Participation Plan
  • See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
  • Attachment Included
  • -PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL- 1 PROPOSED NEED AND JUSTIFICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH RISK EVALUATIONS FOR THE TRANSPORT OF USED NUCLEAR FUEL TO THE PLANNED DGR SITE The following paper which endeavors to address the need and justification for a comprehensive nationwide transportation radiological risk evaluation to be performed in support of the DGR Project’s evolving impact assessment effort, has been provided by the United States-based consulting and engineering firm of SC&A, Inc., an employee-owned Virginia corporation founded in 1981 to support radiation-related and nuclear programs for the government and the private sector. SC&A is known for its superior work in regulatory and policy analyses of environmental and health safety issues, particularly those related to radiation and the nuclear industry. SC&A also provides engineering, health physics, and nuclear fuel cycle consulting services; mathematical modeling and computer code ...

Report

Attachment Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project

  • Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Nicole Corrado
  • Reference Number: 1060
  • Submitted: 2026-05-14
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Comments invited and information sessions on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and draft Public Participation Plan
  • See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
  • Attachment Included
  • From: Nicole Corrado To: Nuclear Waste / Déchets Nucléaires (IAAC/AEIC) Subject: Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada"s Used Nuclear Fuel Project Date: Sunday, May 10, 2026 11:58:22 PM Continually creating toxic waste that lasts 100s of years and dumping it in a cave is a terrible idea. Nuclear will not solve the climate crisis, it will create its own problems. I grew up near a nuclear dump for the first 9 years of my life, and a nuclear power plant for the next 25 years. I think it did affect my health. How will this affect the environment and animals long term? And please do not use animals for testing, or as warning signals. The idea of genetically modifying cats and other animals to glow near nuclear is absolutely cruel (and animal abandonment). Do not drill into the rock to dump nuclear waste, it might create an earthquake. And the Earth is a living sentient being herself. Don't drill into her and fill her with poison. Nuclear should NOT be done near fish ...

Report

Attachment Bruce Power Submission to IAAC for Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project

  • Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project
  • Author: Bruce Power
  • Reference Number: 1043
  • Submitted: 2026-05-13 - 2:26 PM
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: N/A
  • This written submission by Bruce Power is in response to the April 10th, 2026, invitation for Public Comments on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines (TISG) the Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project (the Project).The purpose of this submission is to provide information on the existing legislative framework for the long-term management of used nuclear fuel in Canada as well as express Bruce Power’s support for the scope of assessment outlined in the draft TISG with respect to the transportation of used nuclear fuel.  
  • Attachment Included
  • Bruce Power 177 Tie Rd., Tiverton, ON N0G 2T0 Telephone 519-361-2673 www.brucepower.com May 13, 2026 Impact Assessment Agency of Canada Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project Registry Bruce Power Submission to IAAC for Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project This written submission by Bruce Power is in response to the April 10th, 2026, invitation for Public Comments on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines (TISG) the Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada’s Used Nuclear Fuel Project (the Project). The purpose of this submission is to provide information on the existing legislative framework for the long-term management of used nuclear fuel in Canada as well as express Bruce Power’s support for the scope of assessment outlined in the draft TISG with respect to the transportation of used nuclear fuel. A Robust Framework for Management of Canada’s Used ...

Report

Attachment Ministry of Transportation - Provincial Authority Advice Record

  • Deep Geological Repository (DGR) for Canada's Used Nuclear Fuel Project
  • Author: Administrator on behalf of Ministry of Transportation
  • Reference Number: 1026
  • Submitted: 2026-05-12
  • Project Phase: Planning
  • Participation Notice: Public Notice - Comments invited and information sessions on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and draft Public Participation Plan
  • See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
  • Attachment Included
  • From: Nickerson, Shawn (MTO) To: MacCarthy,Kathryn (IAAC/AEIC) Cc: Nuclear Waste / Déchets Nucléaires (IAAC/AEIC); Ellis, Kevin (MTO); McChristie, Michelle (MTO); Gauthier, Shannon (She/Her) (MTO); Marshall, Gillianne (MTO); Gidley, Patrick (MTO) Subject: RE: Comments on the TISGs for the DGR project Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2026 11:41:31 AM Attachments: image001.png Good morning Kathryn, Thank you for following up. Please see MTO’s draft Integrated Guidelines comments below. Section 10.2, lines 2167–2171: Traffic Impact Study language Commentary: The reference to aligning with MTO’s Traffic Impact Study Guidelines is appropriate; however, the phrase: “The limits of the study area must be approved by MTO in advance of the preparation of the TIS” could be interpreted as MTO co-defining the assessment scope or implicitly endorsing the adequacy of the project’s transportation approach. Suggested revised wording: “As it relates to transportation activities, the proponent is ...

Report
Date modified: