Bruce C Nuclear Project

Attachment SON Comments on TISG and Expectations for Impact Statement

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of Saugeen Ojibway Nation
• Reference Number: 259
• Submitted: 2025-11-03 - 12:55 PM
• Updated: 2025-11-19 - 3:38 PM
• Rationale: Comment updated for administrative purposes
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• November 3, 2025 Larry Shuter Senior Policy Analyst, Consultation Operations Division Impact Assessment Agency of Canada Marina Martin Policy Officer, Indigenous Consultation and Engagement Division Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Mike Rinker Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Bruce Power Joanna Moffat Technical Officer, Indigenous Engagement & Partnerships Bruce Power Dear Mr. Shuter, Ms. Martin, Mr. Rinker and Ms. Moffat: Re: Saugeen Ojibway Nation Additional Comments on the Bruce C Project Assessment We have enclosed with this letter additional comments from the Saugeen Ojibway Nation (SON) on the information that Bruce Power must produce as part of the assessment of the Bruce C Project (the Project). Since the Bruce C Project was first announced, SON has been clear that we are willing to consider the proposal with open minds, but that the Project and its impacts must be carefully assessed and considered before any decision is reached ...
• Attachment Included
• Information shared on this page is for the integrated assessment of the proposed Bruce C project and has not been approved for use for other purposes. This information is the property of SON and can not be used for other purposes without SON's consent. November 3, 2025 Additional Comment Table from Saugeen Ojibway Nation on "Integrated TISG for Bruce C" Submitted to IAAC, CNSC, and Bruce Power as SON Expectations to shape the Impact Statement This table should be read with the cover letter provided by SON. SON was not provided sufficient time to finalize and submit these comments during the Planning Phase of the Integrated Impact Assessment. SON requested additional time for this, but this request was refused. These comments have been submitted as soon as possible. TISG Section Comment/Concern In response to these additional comments, Bruce Power must provide SON with a concordance table showing how each comment has been addressed, and if not addressed, provide a ...

Report

Attachment SON's Concerns respecting process and substance of the Draft Integrated TISG for Proposed Bruce C Nuclear Project

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of Saugeen Ojibway Nation
• Reference Number: 240
• Submitted: 2025-07-22 - 11:03 AM
• Project Phase: Impact Statement
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• Saugeen Ojibway Nation Environment Office 010129 Highway 6, Georgian Bluffs, ON N0H 2T0 (519) 534-5507 saugeenojibwaynation.ca Addressed To: Larry Shuter Senior Policy Analyst, Consultation Operations Division Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) Kirsten Sellers Senior Policy Officer Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) SON’s Concerns respecting process and substance of the Draft Integrated TISG for Proposed Bruce C Nuclear Project DATE: July 22, 2025 Dear Larry and Kirsten, We write further to the Saugeen Ojibway Nation’s (“SON”) letter of June 18, 2025. As conveyed in that letter to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (“IAAC”) and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (“CNSC”), SON was deeply disappointed by the decision to recommence the Planning Phase—a decision which has continued to undermine our ability to engage meaningfully with the federal impact assessment process for the Bruce C Nuclear ...

Report

Attachment Bruce C Nuclear Project

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of Jacquelyn Drechsler and Jocelyn DeCrescenzo
• Reference Number: 228
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 10:41 PM
• Updated: 2025-07-14 - 2:18 PM
• Rationale: Comment updated for administrative purposes
• Project Phase: Impact Statement
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments regarding the Bruce C Project. Without having selected a reactor design, Bruce Power has already started an impact assessment, wanting approval without stating what kind of nuclear power plant they would build. Most assuredly and idiotically putting the cart before the horse.Without this information and wanting approval without stating what kind of power plant they will build, it is impossible for a review panel to approve this project, as their impact assessment would be missing critical information. The guidelines are clear.There has not been an examination of the need for this project, nor an examination of environmentally friendlier and less costly alternatives. How is it possible to even consider approval? There is the matter of the creation of massive amounts of radioactive nuclear waste. What kind of reactor? How much more waste? If SMR's are considered, and according to Lindsay Krall and Alison McFarland, we know ...

Report

Attachment Northwatch's Comment on the draft Public Participation Plan for the Bruce C Nuclear Project

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of Northwatch
• Reference Number: 232
• Submitted: 2025-07-12 - 7:56 AM
• Updated: 2025-07-15 - 3:52 PM
• Rationale: Comment updated for administrative purposes
• Project Phase: Impact Statement
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• Bruce C Nuclear Project Brennain Lloyd Comment on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines IAA Reference # 88771 July 11, 2025 Northwatch Comments on Bruce C Nuclear Project draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines 1 Introduction On June 12, 2025 the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission announced a 30 day comment period closing July 11, 2025 and invited comments on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and the draft public participation plan for the Bruce C Nuclear Project. In total there are four plans – the Draft Indigenous Engagement and Partnership Plan , Draft Permitting Plan, Draft Cooperation Plan, and a Draft Public Participation Plan – but the invitation for public comment was limited to the draft public participation plan. In response to Northwatch’s request that the Agency confirm that there is also a public comment period on the ...
• Attachment Included
• July 11, 2025 Bruce C Nuclear Project Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 160 Elgin Street, 22nd floor. Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 IAA Reference # 88771 Comments on the Public Participation Plan for the Bruce C Nuclear Project Review In the Agency’s June 12th announcement of the 30-day comment period on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and the draft Public Participation Plan, the public was invited to comment on those two draft documents. Our comments on the guidelines are provided under separate cover, as are our brief comments on a Draft Indigenous Engagement and Partnership Plan. Public Participation Plan We have reviewed the draft public participation plan and offer the following comments, suggestions, and / or requests for changes or additions to the final public participation plan: - The revised public participation plan should clearly set out the various steps and public comment opportunities in the ...

Report

Attachment Comments and recommendations on IAA Guidelines for Bruce C project.

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of Sunil Nijhawan
• Reference Number: 231
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 11:55 PM
• Project Phase: Impact Statement
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• Comments and recommendations on IAA Guidelines for Bruce C project. Sunil Nijhawan, PhD P.Eng As a Canadian nuclear safety engineer with over 40 years of hands-on technical safety assessment experience working with all segments of the Canadian nuclear industry (AECL, OPG, CNSC) and a number of reactor designs, I firmly believe that the IAA has a unique opportunity and a legal obligation to ask the proponent the right questions as Canada is sleep-walking towards a nuclear power reactor related disaster of historic proportions with dishonesty in regulation and technical incompetence has taken hold of the power reactor licensing, design evaluation and risk assessment processes. It is alarming that utilities like Bruce Power, the leaser of its reactors - the Ontario Power Generation and the national regulator CNSC have acted in serious collusion for years and almost never solely in public interest. CNSC have not only accepted faulty submissions by the industry, ...

Report

Attachment Comments on Guidelines and Project

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Ecological Justice Working Group, United Church of Canada East
• Reference Number: 226
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 11:54 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Concerns about Project and advice on Guidelines
• Attachment Included
• July 11, 2025 Submission via email:Bruce@iaac-aeic.gc.ca Submission to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines for Bruce C Nuclear Project 88771 Ecojustice Working Group for the United Church of Canada East Contact: Dr. Mary Lou Harley Thank you for this opportunity to submit comments on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines for Bruce C Nuclear Project 88771. The United Church of Canada has a long history of policies, documents, and submissions to public calls for input on social, environmental and ethical issues relating to energy issues, including nuclear power issues.1 This submission is grounded in that extensive base of information and experience. Some excerpts of ethical reflections that underpin the work of the United Church of Canada on nuclear power and other energy issues, and bring the Ecological Justice Working Group to address concerns about the impact ...

Report

Attachment Judith Fox Lee Comments on the Bruce C draft guidelines and public participation plan

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of Judith Fox Lee
• Reference Number: 230
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 11:21 PM
• Updated: 2025-07-18 - 2:24 PM
• Rationale: Comment updated for administrative purposes
• Project Phase: Impact Statement
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• 1 From: Judith Fox Lee Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 11:21 PM To: Bruce C Nuclear Integrated Assessment / Évaluation Intégrée Bruce C Nucléaire (IAAC/AEIC) Subject: Judith Fox Lee Comments on the Bruce C draft guidelines and public participation plan Categories: Add to DL To Whom It May Concern, I, Judith Fox Lee of Perth Ontario hereby submit my comments on the draft Integrated Guidelines and the draft Public Participation Plan for the Bruce C Nuclear Project, its current expansion proposal. I will appreciate it if my comments are fully tracked, posted and shared with all concerned members of the Proponent's team, the related IAAC and CNSC staff, the Review Panel members, and the Governor in Council, to assist them in making a reasonable determination on this Integrated Assessment process, in deciding whether the project is in the public interest . I also hereby ask to be added to the distribution list at this same email address, . To wit: I fully recommend that ...

Report

Attachment Bruce C Nuclear Project Public Comment

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: N/A
• Reference Number: 225
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 10:21 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• My name is Lydia Schroeder-Hart. I am a resident of south-eastern Manitoba. I am involved as an activist with an anti-nuclear organization but this comment is my own personal response to the proposed Bruce Project. The Bruce Nuclear project is proposed to be doubled to be the largest nuclear generating energy project in the world. it will also generate a correspondingly increased amount of spent highly reactive nuclear waste.  There has been a process in Ontario to plan for a Deep Geological Repository at Revel by Wabigoon Lake in Ontario which would serve as the repository for nuclear waste from across Canada that is a matter of concern for me as a Manitoba resident. I am located within the Winnipeg River watershed. The Deep Geological Repository is untested in practice. The plan is for projects like the proposed Bruce site to transport their nuclear waste to the Revel site, then the waste will be unloaded, processed for depositing into the DGR and then executing the ...

Report

Attachment I think it is premature and irresponsible to apply for a permit before establishing if there is a demonstrated need for more reactors, without specifying what design you wish to build and without a viable solution for the disposal of the radioactive waste that will be produced. This all seems bizar

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Sheila Burr
• Reference Number: 224
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 10:20 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• I think it is premature and irresponsible to be requesting a permit when the need for more reactors has not been demonstrated, when the design has not been specified, and a plan for the disposal of the radioactive waste has not been decided. This is bizarre.

Report

Attachment Comments re "Guidelines" for the Bruce C Impact Assessment

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of Kerstin Muth
• Reference Number: 229
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 8:17 PM
• Project Phase: Impact Statement
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• 1 From: Kerstin Muth Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 8:17 PM To: Bruce C Nuclear Integrated Assessment / Évaluation Intégrée Bruce C Nucléaire (IAAC/AEIC) Subject: Comments re “Guidelines” for the Bruce C Impact Assessment Categories: Add to DL Comments re “Guidelines” for the Bruce C Impact Assessment To whom it may concern: My interest in the project is primarily because of my concern about climate change and also nuclear waste. The proponent states that that one need for the project is for low-carbon emitting electricity supply. The plan to address the climate emergency is to reduce carbon emissions to net-zero by 2050. The next 2-3 decades are critical. Construction of new power plants and mining and refining of the fuel will produce considerable carbon emissions. The proponent should provide detailed accounting of the timeline of carbon emissions that are likely to be produced by particular project including the construction of the plant, the production ...

Report

Attachment Angel Hamilton Public Comment on Bruce Power Expansion

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Angel Hamilton
• Reference Number: 223
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 7:53 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Public Comment by Angel Hamilton Friday July 11, 2025 I am writing today to discuss my concerns about the expansion of of Bruce Power by creating potential to add up to 4,800 MW of new nuclear capacity at their existing site in the municipality of Kincardine on the eastern shore of Lake Huron, Canada. Yes it does offer low carbon electricity that could contribute to climate change goals however I feel there is a lot of risks of expansion of nuclear reactors in the Great Lakes in close proximity to where the most fresh water in the planet  that is located ie Elmvale, Ontario and humans only have access to 1% of the fresh water that we need and once it is contaminated, there will be no more of this important non-renewable resource. Ontario, Canada, is known for its abundant freshwater resources, particularly its lakes. Specifically, Manitoulin Island is recognized as the world's largest freshwater island which is across from Bruce ...

Report

Attachment Bruce C Nuclear Project - comments on Draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Public Participation Plan

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Township of Huron-Kinloss
• Reference Number: 222
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 5:08 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Comments included within the attachment. 
• Attachment Included
• The Corporation of the Township of Huron-Kinloss 21 Queen Street 519-395-3735 P.O. Box 130 Fax: 519-395-4107 Ripley, Ontario info@huronkinloss.com N0G 2R0 www.huronkinloss.com Page 1 of 4 Township of Huron-Kinloss Submission July 11, 2025 Bruce C Nuclear Project Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 22nd Floor, 160 Elgin Street Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Bruce@iaac-aeic.gc.ca The Township of Huron-Kinloss comments to IAAC & CNSC on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Public Participation Plan for the Bruce C New Nuclear Project Greetings, The Township of Huron-Kinloss welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on the Draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines (TISG) and the Draft Public Participation Plan for the Bruce C Nuclear Project. The proposed project site is located less than 30km from the Township of Huron- Kinloss and anticipated to have direct impacts to our community and our residents. These comments are intended to ...

Report

Attachment Comment on Bruce C Nuclear Project

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of Sara Williamson
• Reference Number: 236
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 5:08 PM
• Project Phase: Impact Statement
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• 1 From: Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 5:08 PM To: Bruce C Nuclear Integrated Assessment / Évaluation Intégrée Bruce C Nucléaire (IAAC/AEIC) Subject: Comment on Bruce C Nuclear Project My comments regarding the present draft guidelines are as follows I agree with the comments of NorthWatch that state their opposition to developing further use of nuclear power. I too am opposed to this project on the basis of nuclear power production being a high-cost and high-risk option for the generation of electricity and which produces a range of radioactive wastes, some of which must be contained and kept separate from the environment into perpetuity. The technology produces adverse effects along the nuclear fuel chain – uranium mining, milling, refining, conversion and fuel production – while consuming large amounts of energy and generating greenhouse gasses at each step. All these impacts are prior to operation of the reactors; during operation, nuclear reactors release ...

Report

Attachment Comments on Draft Cooperation Plan and Draft Integrated Impact Statement Guidelines

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
• Reference Number: 221
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 5:06 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Attached are the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) comments on both the draft cooperation plan and draft integrated impact statement guidelines.  Please note that MECP may have additional technical comments to provide.  We appreciate and thank you for the opportunity to comment.  Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or would like to discuss the attached comments. 
• Attachment Included
• CIAR #: 88771 Bruce C Nuclear Project Page 1 of 4 Comment Form – Draft Cooperation Plan and Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines – Provincial Review Team Bruce C Nuclear Project Response required by: July 11, 2025 All comments should be submitted via the Submit a Comment feature available on the Project’s Canadian Impact Assessment Registry page (https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/88771?culture=en-CA). Documents can be uploaded using this feature. If you have any difficulties submitting this way, please contact the Registry directly at registry-registre@iaac-aeic.gc.ca. All comments submitted using this form will be posted on the Registry website for the Project. Please note that this is your opportunity to tailor the draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines. Ministry/Office: Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks IA Contact: May Lyn Trudelle Telephone: 437-855-6117 Email: MayLyn.Trudelle@ontario.ca ...

Report

Attachment Comment on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines for the Bruce C Nuclear Project.

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of Susan O'Donnell
• Reference Number: 227
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 4:32 PM
• Project Phase: Impact Statement
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• The CEDAR Project Sustainability and Environmental Studies St. Thomas University 51 Dineen Drive Fredericton, New Brunswick Canada E3B 5G3 https://cedar-project.org info@cedar-project.org Bruce C Nuclear Project Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 160 Elgin Street, 22nd floor Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 Submitted via email: Bruce@iaac-aeic.gc.ca July 11, 2025 Comment on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines for the Bruce C Nuclear Project. Last year we submitted a letter (Oct. 28, 2024) to this IAAC process for the Bruce C Nuclear Project outlining our reasons for insisting that alternatives to the proposed project be considered in the Guidelines document for the Impact Assessment. We are dismayed to see that alternatives to the proposed project are not included in the draft Guidelines document and urge you to include this requirement in the final document. In our earlier letter, we alerted you to an ...

Report

Attachment Comments on the Draft Cooperation Plan and the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Ministry of Natural Resources
• Reference Number: 220
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 4:20 PM
• Updated: 2025-11-07 - 3:18 PM
• Rationale: Comment updated for administrative purposes
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Thank you for the opportunity to review the draft Cooperation Plan and the draft Integrated Guidelines for the Bruce C Nuclear Project. Please find MNR's responses in the attached form. We have intentionally left the Table in Section 2 blank. The draft Integrated Guidelines are comprehensive and we do not foresee any information requirements extending outside of these requirements for any potential provincial legislative or regulatory oversight. Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have any questions.
• Attachment Included
• CIAR #: 88771 Bruce C Nuclear Project Page 1 of 3 Comment Form – Draft Cooperation Plan and Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines – Provincial Review Team Bruce C Nuclear Project Response required by: July 11, 2025 Revised by MNR and submitted August 12, 2025 All comments should be submitted via the Submit a Comment feature available on the Project’s Canadian Impact Assessment Registry page (https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/88771?culture=en-CA). Documents can be uploaded using this feature. If you have any difficulties submitting this way, please contact the Registry directly at registry-registre@iaac-aeic.gc.ca. All comments submitted using this form will be posted on the Registry website for the Project. Please note that this is your opportunity to tailor the draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines. Ministry/Office: Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) - Land Use Planning and Strategic Issues Section (LUPSIS) ...

Report

Attachment Comments on draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Cooperation Plan on the Bruce C Nuclear Project

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism (Heritage Planning Unit)
• Reference Number: 217
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 3:38 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Dear IAAC team, Please find attached the Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism’s comments on the draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Cooperation Plan on the Bruce C Nuclear Project. Do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. Best regards, Anastasia Abrazhevich  | Heritage Planner Heritage Planner | Citizenship, Inclusion and Heritage Division Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism  |  Ontario Public Service 437.240.2379 | Anastasia.Abrazhevich@ontario.ca   Submitted by The Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculuturalism     
• Attachment Included
• CIAR #: 88771 Bruce C Nuclear Project Page 1 of 7 Comment Form – Draft Cooperation Plan and Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines – Provincial Review Team Bruce C Nuclear Project Response required by: July 11, 2025 All comments should be submitted via the Submit a Comment feature available on the Project’s Canadian Impact Assessment Registry page (https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/88771?culture=en-CA). Documents can be uploaded using this feature. If you have any difficulties submitting this way, please contact the Registry directly at registry-registre@iaac-aeic.gc.ca. All comments submitted using this form will be posted on the Registry website for the Project. Please note that this is your opportunity to tailor the draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines. Ministry/Office: Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism (MCM) IA Contact: Anastasia Abrazhevich, Heritage Planner, Heritage Planning Unit Karla ...

Report

Attachment DFO comments on the draft TISGs for the Bruce C Nuclear Project

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Fisheries and Oceans Canada
• Reference Number: 216
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 3:32 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Please find the attached comments from DFO on the draft TISGs for Bruce C Nuclear Project, as requested by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada.
• Attachment Included
• CIAR #: 88771 Bruce C Nuclear Project Page 1 of 6 Unclassified - Non-Classifié Comment Form – Draft Permitting Plan and draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines – Federal Review Team Bruce C Nuclear Project Response required by: July 11, 2025 All comments should be submitted via the Submit a Comment feature available on the Project’s Canadian Impact Assessment Registry1 (the Registry). Documents can be uploaded using this feature. If you have any difficulties submitting this way, please contact the Registry team directly at registry-registre@iaac-aeic.gc.ca. All comments submitted using this form will be posted on the Registry website for the Project. Please note that this is your opportunity to customize the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines. Department/Agency: Department of Fisheries and Oceans IA Contact: William Glass Telephone: (289) 527-1128 Email: William.Glass@afo-mpo.gc.ca Section 1 – Draft Permitting ...

Report

Attachment Transport Canada Comments on the Draft Permitting Plan and Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines for the Bruce C Nuclear Project

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Transport Canada
• Reference Number: 215
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 3:25 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Transport Canada's Comments on the Draft Permitting Plan and Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines for the Bruce C Nuclear Project are attached.
• Attachment Included
• CIAR #: 88771 Bruce C Nuclear Project Page 1 of 3 Comment Form – Draft Permitting Plan and draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines – Federal Review Team Bruce C Nuclear Project All comments should be submitted via the Submit a Comment feature available on the Project’s Canadian Impact Assessment Registry1 (the Registry). Documents can be uploaded using this feature. If you have any difficulties submitting this way, please contact the Registry team directly at registry-registre@iaac-aeic.gc.ca. All comments submitted using this form will be posted on the Registry website for the Project. Please note that this is your opportunity to customize the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines. Department/Agency: Transport Canada IA Contact: Jeremy Craigs Telephone: Email: Jeremy.craigs@tc.gc.ca Section 1 – Draft Permitting Plan: 1. Indicate whether your department or agency has identified any power that it will be unable to ...

Report

Attachment Nuclear Waste

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of Daryl Gale
• Reference Number: 219
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 3:08 PM
• Project Phase: Impact Statement
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• 1 From: daryl Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 3:08 PM To: Bruce C Nuclear Integrated Assessment / Évaluation Intégrée Bruce C Nucléaire (IAAC/AEIC) Subject: Nuclear Waste Please Don't Make the Same Mistakes That California And SoCal Edison Have Made Regarding San Onofre! When our plant was shu ered in 2013 due to steam generator issues, even a er numerous hearings and public comments, our California Coastal Commission told Edison it was OK to just leave 3.6 pounds of high level radioac ve waste in 5/8" inch canisters on the beach next to the shu ered.plant. None of our federal representa ves, our governors, our state senators and assembly made Any Effort to find a be er place for it! No one spoke up to say they didn't want it on their highly popular and lucra ve tourist beach or spoiling their quite expensive beach front property. No federal or state environmental agency offered to look for a storage place or even get us a Hot Cell so we could plan to move it And ...

Report

Attachment Health Canada's Comments on the Draft Permitting Plan and Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines for the Bruce C Nuclear Project

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Health Canada
• Reference Number: 214
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 3:00 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Dear Joshua Won,   Thank you for your email on June 12, 2025, requesting Health Canada’s review of the Draft Permitting Plan and Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines for the Bruce C Nuclear Project. Health Canada has completed its review of the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and has provided comments in the attachment.   Should you have any questions related to Health Canada’s comments, please contact the undersigned.    Sincerely,     Impact Assessment Team Health Canada / Government of Canada ia-ei@hc-sc.gc.ca (mailto:ia-ei@hc-sc.gc.ca) L’équipe d’évaluation d’impact Santé Canada / Gouvernement du Canada ia-ei@hc-sc.gc.ca (mailto:ia-ei@hc-sc.gc.ca)
• Attachment Included
• 1 Environmental Health Program Regulatory Operations and Enforcement Branch Health Canada 180 Queen Street West, Floor 10 Toronto, Ontario M5V 3L7 July 11, 2025 Joshua Won Integrated Review Team for the Bruce C Nuclear Project Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 55 York St Toronto, ON M5J 1R7 Submitted to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada Registry Health Canada’s Comments on the Draft Permitting Plan and Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines for the Bruce C Nuclear Project Dear Joshua Won, Thank you for your email on June 12, 2025, requesting Health Canada’s review of the Draft Permitting Plan and Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines for the Bruce C Nuclear Project. Health Canada is the federal department responsible for helping Canadians maintain and improve their health. One of the ways this is accomplished is through participation in the review of potential ...
• Attachment Included
• CIAR #: 88771 Bruce C Nuclear Project Page 1 of 9 Unclassified / Non classifié Comment Form – Draft Permitting Plan and draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines – Federal Review Team Bruce C Nuclear Project Response required by: July 11, 2025 All comments should be submitted via the Submit a Comment feature available on the Project’s Canadian Impact Assessment Registry1 (the Registry). Documents can be uploaded using this feature. If you have any difficulties submitting this way, please contact the Registry team directly at registry-registre@iaac-aeic.gc.ca. All comments submitted using this form will be posted on the Registry website for the Project. Please note that this is your opportunity to tailor the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines. Department/Agency: Health Canada 180 Queen Street West – 10th Floor Toronto, Ontario IA Contact: Joel Kaushansky Regional Impact Assessment Specialist – Ontario Region ...

Report

Attachment Municipality of Kincardine - submission on draft documents

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Municipality of Kincardine
• Reference Number: 211
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 2:08 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Please accept the attached comments from the Municipality of Kincardine on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines, the draft Public Participation Plan, the draft Cooperation Plan and the draft Permittig Plan.
• Attachment Included
• The Municipality of Kincardine 1475 Concession 5, R.R. #5, Kincardine, ON N2Z 2X6 Phone: 519-396-3468 | Fax: 519-396-8288 kincardine.ca June 25, 2025 Bruce C Nuclear Project Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 RE: Municipality of Kincardine comments on the draft Public Participation Plan To Whom it May Concern: Please accept this submission from the Municipality of Kincardine on the draft Public Participation Plan for the Bruce C Nuclear Project. This submission was endorsed by the Council for the Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine at the July 9, 2025 meeting. The Municipality of Kincardine is the host municipality to Bruce Power, Ontario Power Generations’ Western Waste Management Facility and the Douglas Point Nuclear Generating Station. The Municipality, including the former Township of Bruce, has been host to the nuclear industry for almost 60 years. Our Mayor and Council are ...
• Attachment Included
• The Municipality of Kincardine 1475 Concession 5, R.R. #5, Kincardine, ON N2Z 2X6 Phone: 519-396-3468 | Fax: 519-396-8288 kincardine.ca June 25, 2025 Bruce C Nuclear Project Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 RE: Municipality of Kincardine comments on the Bruce C draft Permitting Plan To Whom it May Concern: Please accept this submission from the Municipality of Kincardine on the draft Permitting Plan for the Bruce C Nuclear Project. These comments have been endorsed by the Council for the Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine at the July 9, 2025 meeting. We request that these comments be reflected in the final Permitting Plan and if they are not included, we request a written response with the detailed rational. The Municipality of Kincardine is the host community to the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station, the Ontario Power Generation (OPG) Western Waste Management Facility and the ...
• Attachment Included
• The Municipality of Kincardine 1475 Concession 5, R.R. #5, Kincardine, ON N2Z 2X6 Phone: 519-396-3468 | Fax: 519-396-8288 kincardine.ca July 9, 2025 Bruce C Nuclear Project Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 RE: Municipality of Kincardine comments on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and input on the Summary of Potential Federal Incidental Activities To Whom it May Concern: Please accept this submission as initial comments from the Municipality of Kincardine on the draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines (herein referred to as the draft Integrated Guidelines) for the Bruce C Nuclear Project and input on the Summary of Potential Federal Incidental Activities. Please note that with the limited time available for public review, these comments are not comprehensive and there may be items in the future that the host community may wish to bring forward to the ...
• Attachment Included
• The Municipality of Kincardine 1475 Concession 5, R.R. #5, Kincardine, ON N2Z 2X6 Phone: 519-396-3468 | Fax: 519-396-8288 kincardine.ca June 25, 2025 Bruce C Nuclear Project Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 RE: Municipality of Kincardine comments on the Bruce C draft Cooperation Plan To Whom it May Concern: Please accept the comments below from the Municipality of Kincardine on the draft Cooperation Plan for the Bruce C Nuclear Project. This submission was endorsed by the Council for the Corporation of the Municipality of Kincardine at the July 9, 2025, meeting. The Municipality of Kincardine is the host Municipality to Bruce Power, Ontario Power Generation’s Western Waste Management Facility and the Douglas Point Nuclear Generating Station. Combined, our Municipality is host to one of the world’s largest nuclear facilities. The Municipality’s expectation is that there will be a ...

Report

Attachment Bruce County Submission to IAAC and CNSC for the Bruce C Nuclear Project Draft TISG and Public Participation Plan

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Corporation of the County of Bruce
• Reference Number: 210
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 1:57 PM
• Project Phase: Planning
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments Invited and Information Sessions on the Draft Integrated Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines and Draft Public Participation Plan
• Please find attached the submission for the Bruce C Nuclear Project.
• Attachment Included
• Corporation of the County of Bruce 30 Park Street, P.O. Box 70, Walkerton, ON, N0G 2V0 brucecounty.on.ca July 10, 2025 Bruce C Nuclear Project Impact Assessment Agency of Canada 22nd floor, 160 Elgin Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 Via email: Bruce@iaac-aeic.gc.ca Dear Sir/Madam, Please find attached Bruce County’s formal submission on the Draft Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines (TISG) and Public Participation Plan for the Bruce C Nuclear Project, as endorsed by County Council on July 10, 2025. As the upper-tier municipality for eight lower-tier (local) municipalities, Bruce County is responsible for delivering a range of infrastructure and services that are expected to be directly impacted by this project— including emergency response, transportation, housing, and workforce development. Our submission reflects support for the need for municipal readiness and community well-being as the Bruce C Nuclear Project moves forward in the Impact Assessment ...

Report

Attachment Comments on the draft guidelines for the Bruce C project impact assessment

• Bruce C Nuclear Project
• Author: Administrator on behalf of J. P. Unger
• Reference Number: 218
• Submitted: 2025-07-11 - 1:55 PM
• Project Phase: Impact Statement
• Participation Notice: Public notice - Public comments invited
• See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe
• Attachment Included
• 1 From: J. P. Unger Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 1:55 PM To: Bruce C Nuclear Integrated Assessment / Évaluation Intégrée Bruce C Nucléaire (IAAC/AEIC) Cc: CEO President / PD Président (CNSC/CCSN); ; ; ; ; news@bellmedia.ca; ontariotoday@cbc.ca; city@thestar.ca Subject: Comments on the draft guidelines for the Bruce C project impact assessment - JPU11JUL2025 Dear Madams, Sirs, Please find below comments on the draft guidelines for the Bruce C nuclear power plant project Impact Assessment, being sent before tonight's 11:59 p.m. deadline. The comments below include a need to present a number of things that seem to be absent from these impact assessment guidelines -for example, expected amounts of daily and yearly radioactive particle emissions from reactor operations, possible spread areas, expected accumulation and spread through affected food chains and cancer risks resulting from the spread and absorption of Category 1 carcinogens emitted by the nuclear power ...

Report