Projet de charbon cokéfiable Crown Mountain

Comment Search Mobile

Comment Search

Passer aux filtres

70 résultats

Attachment Natural Resources Canada comments on EIS

  • Projet de charbon cokéfiable Crown Mountain
  • Auteur : Administrateur de la part de Natural Resources Canada
  • Numéro de référence : 73
  • Présenté : 2024-05-30 18 h 49
  • Phase du projet : S.O.
  • Avis de participation : S.O.
  • See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce ci-jointe 
  • Inclus pièce jointe
  • Pacific and Yukon Region Région du Pacifique et du Yukon 210A–757 West Hastings St. 210A–757, rue Hastings Ouest Vancouver BC V6C 3M2 Vancouver (Colombie-Britannique) V6C 3M2 UNCLASSIFIED - NON CLASSIFIÉ ANNEX 1: Advice to the Agency Table 1: Advice for the Agency’s consideration in its recommendation to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change and preparation of draft potential conditions Questions Responses/Comments • Has the Proponent described all project components and activities in sufficient detail to understand all relevant project-environment interactions? If not, identify what additional information is needed. No. The outline of the pit was not included in the geological cross-sections, which limits NRCan's ability to thoroughly review the assessment of potential metal leaching and acid rock drainage generation from the pit walls, consequently impacting the evaluation of site water quality. • Were the ...
  • Inclus pièce jointe
  • UNCLASSIFIED - NON CLASSIFIÉ February 28, 2024 CIAR File No.: 80087 Stefan Crampton Project Manager, Pacific and Yukon Region Impact Assessment Agency of Canada stefan.crampton@iaac-aeic.gc.ca Subject: Natural Resources Canada’s Submission for the Crown Mountain Coking Coal Project– Request for Technical Review of EIS On January 29, 2024, the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (the Agency) requested Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) to conduct a technical review of NWP Coal Canada Ltd.’s (the Proponent) environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Crown Mountain Coking Coal Project. In particular, the Agency requested NRCan provide advice on the following: • the sufficiency of baseline data and appropriateness of methodologies to predict effects; • the mitigation measures proposed by NWP Coal Canada Ltd. (the Proponent); • the level of certainty in the conclusions reached by the Proponent on the effects; ...

Signaler

Attachment 2024.02.28. Natural Resources Canada Comments on EIS

  • Projet de charbon cokéfiable Crown Mountain
  • Auteur : Administrateur de la part de Natural Resources Canada
  • Numéro de référence : 62
  • Présenté : 2024-02-28
  • Phase du projet : S.O.
  • Avis de participation : Avis public - Période de consultation publique sur le résumé de l'étude d'impact environnemental
  • See the attached submission / Veuillez consulter la pièce jointe.
  • Inclus pièce jointe
  • UNCLASSIFIED - NON CLASSIFIÉ February 28, 2024 CIAR File No.: 80087 Stefan Crampton Project Manager, Pacific and Yukon Region Impact Assessment Agency of Canada stefan.crampton@iaac-aeic.gc.ca Subject: Natural Resources Canada’s Submission for the Crown Mountain Coking Coal Project– Request for Technical Review of EIS On January 29, 2024, the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (the Agency) requested Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) to conduct a technical review of NWP Coal Canada Ltd.’s (the Proponent) environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Crown Mountain Coking Coal Project. In particular, the Agency requested NRCan provide advice on the following: • the sufficiency of baseline data and appropriateness of methodologies to predict effects; • the mitigation measures proposed by NWP Coal Canada Ltd. (the Proponent); • the level of certainty in the conclusions reached by the Proponent on the effects; ...
  • Inclus pièce jointe
  • Pacific and Yukon Region Région du Pacifique et du Yukon 210A–757 West Hastings St. 210A–757, rue Hastings Ouest Vancouver BC V6C 3M2 Vancouver (Colombie-Britannique) V6C 3M2 UNCLASSIFIED - NON CLASSIFIÉ ANNEX 1: Advice to the Agency Table 1: Advice for the Agency’s consideration in its recommendation to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change and preparation of draft potential conditions Questions Responses/Comments • Has the Proponent described all project components and activities in sufficient detail to understand all relevant project-environment interactions? If not, identify what additional information is needed. No. The outline of the pit was not included in the geological cross-sections, which limits NRCan's ability to thoroughly review the assessment of potential metal leaching and acid rock drainage generation from the pit walls, consequently impacting the evaluation of site water quality. • Were the ...

Signaler

Attachment Continued Devastation in Southeastern British Columbia

  • Projet de charbon cokéfiable Crown Mountain
  • Auteur : Hanna Whiting
  • Numéro de référence : 39
  • Présenté : 2024-02-25 21 h 33
  • Phase du projet : S.O.
  • Avis de participation : S.O.
  • Please find my response to NWP's proposition to establish an open pit mettaurgical coal mine 12km north of the District of Sparwood, attatched.  For further information on why this project is NOT in the best interest of the public, or environment please follow this link to a podcast that also has researched this Project: https://open.spotify.com/episode/67rzuKOoD3sn1KlLK2NqIQ?si=a6aaac7fc15f4ac0
  • Inclus pièce jointe
  • After thorough review of the NWP (hereafter known as the Proponent) Crown Mountain Coal Project (hereafter known as the Project) located twelve kilometers (km) north of the District of Sparwood, British Columbia (BC), it can be determined that this Project is not in the public’s best interest. For example, although the Proponent identified approximately 55 Valued Components (VC), of which three are regionally valued components through the Elk Valley Cumulative Effects Management Framework (EV-CEMF) (Grizzly bear, Old and Mature Growth forests, and Riparian Areas), their sheer lack of respect and ignorance for the detrimental cumulative and initial effects, of a Project of this capacity, is outstanding. Not only does the Proponent not believe that the Project will cause any significant, residual effects, but they have not yet developed any formal, practical mitigation measures to compensate for any VC, even those that have been identified as regionally valued ...

Signaler

Date de soumission Afficher les filtres

Filters

Avis de participationAfficher les filtres

Date de modification :